翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Silva Porto ・ Silva Project ・ Silva Reinaldo Ribeiro ・ Silva rerum ・ SILVA ribosomal RNA database ・ Silva Ridge ・ Silva SD ・ Silva Shahakian ・ Silva Tagliagamba ・ Silva, Missouri ・ Silva-Bet ・ Silva-Coroner ・ Silvabestius ・ Silvacane Abbey ・ Silvaco ・ Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp. ・ Silvacola ・ Silvae ・ Silvain ・ Silval Barbosa ・ Silvalen ・ Silvan (disambiguation) ・ Silvan (illusionist) ・ Silvan Aegerter ・ Silvan Byggemarked ・ Silvan Dam ・ Silvan Dillier ・ Silvan Elves ・ Silvan Inia ・ Silvan Kindle Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp. ''Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp'' was a trade secrets case heard before the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District. Silvaco sued Intel for misappropriation of trade secrets because Intel used software produced by a third-party that had misappropriated Silvaco's trade secrets. The appeals court affirmed the decision of the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Intel, finding that merely using infringing software does not constitute a trade secret infringement in itself. ==Background== Silvaco is a California-based company that produces electronic design automation (EDA) software. Silvaco makes several EDA products including SmartSpice, a tool for designing and simulating analog circuits. In December 2000, Silvaco sued Circuit Semantics, Inc. (CSI) for misappropriating Silvaco's trade secrets in the design of DynaSpice, a CSI product that competed with SmartSpice. This case went to trial, where Silvaco eventually prevailed. Silvaco then sued several customers of CSI that had used DynaSpice, including Intel. Silvaco argued that by using DynaSpice, Intel was guilty of misappropriation of trade secrets under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA). Intel demurred; that is, they argued that, even if they had used DynaSpice, their use of DynaSpice did not constitute misappropriation of trade secrets. In particular, Intel presented evidence that they only received the object code for DynaSpice, not the source code, and that because object code "does not readily yield its underlying design to human understanding", possession of object code does not imply possession of information that would be protected as a trade secret. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Intel, stating that: Silvaco appealed the trial court's decision. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.